I wanted to run this by the community for advice and best practice.

We use Account SQL Traits to enrich Account profiles today, so each computation generates a Group call and adds the traits to the Account.

I built out a rETL model and have looked at the Segment Profiles destinations to replicate this approach with rETL. However, when configuring the Group mapping in the Segment Profiles destination, it requires that I set either an anonymousId or userId, neither of which I would have since I just want to enrich the Account profile.

I don’t see a way to replicate Account SQL traits for this unless I generate/populate an arbitrary anonymous ID to use.  I’ve noticed that the Group calls that get generated from the account SQL Trait use a static anonymous ID - __segment_internal_personas_group. Would it be safe to simply use this exact same value in the Group mapping of the Segment Profiles destination in order to get it to work?